<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>all agriculture stories</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/topic/4230</link>
 <description>Stories within a topic (RSS)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Invention of cooking drove evolution of the human species, new book argues</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/culture-society/articles/invention-cooking-drove-evolution-human-species-new-book-argues</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;“You are what you eat.” Can these pithy words explain the evolution of the human species?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, says &lt;a title=&quot;Richard Wrangham&quot; href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/directory/researchers/richard-wrangham&quot;&gt;Richard Wrangham&lt;/a&gt; of Harvard University, who argues in a new book that the invention of cooking — even more than agriculture, the eating of meat, or the advent of tools — is what led to the rise of humanity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/culture-society/articles/invention-cooking-drove-evolution-human-species-new-book-argues&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:33:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>50443248</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20843 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Culture skews human evolution</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/foundations/articles/culture-skews-human-evolution</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rise of agriculture 10,000 years ago meant the end of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle for which human beings had been optimized by millions of years of evolution and the beginning of an era where culture encourages habits unhealthy for us and for the world around, with uncertain evolutionary outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“Our bodies are not that well designed for the world we have created,” said &lt;a title=&quot;&quot; href=&quot;http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/directory/programs/department-anthropology&quot;&gt;anthropology&lt;/a&gt; professor &lt;a title=&quot;Daniel Lieberman&quot; href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/directory/researchers/daniel-lieberman&quot;&gt;Daniel Lieberman&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/foundations/articles/culture-skews-human-evolution&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:32:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>50443248</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20657 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tamed 11,400 years ago, figs likely first domesticated crop</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/animal-vegetable-mineral/articles/tamed-11400-years-ago-figs-likely-first-domesticated-crop</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Archaeobotanists have found evidence that the dawn of  agriculture may have come with the domestication of fig trees in  the Near East some 11,400 years ago, roughly 1,000 years  before such staples as wheat, barley, and legumes were  domesticated in the region. The discovery dates domesticated  figs to a period some 5,000 years earlier than previously  thought, making the fruit trees the oldest known domesticated  crop.
&lt;p&gt;Ofer Bar-Yosef of Harvard University and Mordechai E. Kislev  and Anat Hartmann of Bar-Ilan University reported their findings  in the journal Science.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Eleven thousand years ago, there was a critical switch in the  human mind - from exploiting the Earth as it is to actively  changing the environment to suit our needs,&quot; says Bar-Yosef,  professor of anthropology in Harvard&#039;s Faculty of Arts and  Sciences and curator of Paleolithic archaeology at Harvard&#039;s  Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. &quot;People  decided to intervene in nature and supply their own food rather  than relying on what was provided by the gods. This shift to a  sedentary lifestyle grounded in the growing of wild crops such  as barley and wheat marked a dramatic change from 2.5 million  years of humans as mobile hunter-gatherers.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;The research was sponsored by the American School of  Prehistoric Research at Harvard&#039;s Peabody Museum, the Israel  Museum in Jerusalem, the Shelby-White-Leon Levy Foundation,  and the Koschitzky Foundation at Bar-Ilan University.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:27:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3830 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eating plants that grow on plants</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/animal-vegetable-mineral/articles/eating-plants-grow-plants</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Parasitic plants are not just a biological curiosity. Every year,  parasitic plants damage farmers&#039; fields, particularly in Africa.  Kristin Lewis, a junior fellow at the Rowland Institute at Harvard,  is learning more about plants and their parasites.
&lt;p&gt;For instance, in Africa, seeds of parasitic plants blow in from  surrounding environments or are deposited in bird droppings.  The plants that grow from those seeds attach to roots and  stems, sucking vital nutrients, stunting the crop plants&#039; growth,  and reducing yields.
&lt;p&gt;To foil the parasites, African farmers have adopted the practice  of planting fields twice, first with plants that are resistant to the  parasites and then, after the parasites germinate and die, with  their desired crop, such as sorghum.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Most of them are very problematic plants,&quot; Lewis said.
&lt;p&gt;Lewis became interested in parasitic plants while studying plant  defenses. Though they can&#039;t fight back as an animal would,  plants can generate a wide variety of substances that are toxic  or distasteful to insects and other browsers.
&lt;p&gt;In fact, some of our best-known commercial plants are popular  exactly because of the unique qualities of the plant&#039;s chemical  defenses. Caffeine and nicotine, for example, as well as the hot  spices contained in pepper plants, are all intended by the plant  to discourage herbivores.
&lt;p&gt;After studying plants&#039; reactions to insects eating their leaves,  Lewis became interested in the interaction of a plant and its  parasite.
&lt;p&gt;She already knew that in some cases a parasitic plant shares the  host plant&#039;s defensive chemicals, as well as nutrients and  carbohydrates. What she wants to find out is how much the two  plants communicate.
&lt;p&gt;If an insect attacks a parasitic plant, that insect is just a short  distance from the host plant. Though normally the host wouldn&#039;t  benefit from helping its parasite, it&#039;s possible the parasite could  manipulate the host into shifting more defensive chemicals into  the parasite to keep the leaf-eating insect at bay - over there.  That would require some sort of communication from the  parasite to the host saying, in essence: &quot;Send help fast. It&#039;s  BITING me!&quot;
&lt;p&gt;Lewis said she&#039;s still gathering data, but she remains fascinated  by the active responses to the environment of plants, which on  the surface seem so passive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:26:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3792 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Beetle mania</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/beetle-mania</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grain weevils alone cost the global economy about $35 billion, or a third of the world&#039;s grain crop, every year. Various other beetle species damage dozens of crops including bamboo, palm trees, bananas, grasses, sugarcane, pines, and irises. &quot;My research is about the evolution of interactions of various sorts,&quot; Professor Brian D. Farrell says, &quot;including those with plants, those with fungi that help insects attack plants, and those with bacteria that help insects digest plants.&quot; His main focus of late has been on bark beetles, which cause about $7 billion of timber damage in the United States alone. &quot;We spend tens of millions of dollars every year studying all aspects of their biology,&quot; he says.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/beetle-mania&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:25:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3274 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mustard shows backbone in its own defense</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/mustard-shows-backbone-its-own-defense</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over the past few years, accumulated evidence from many scientists suggests that plants, animals, and insects share common elements in their innate skirmishes with potential pathogens. In the Feb. 28, 2002 issue of the journal Nature, plant scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard and their colleagues have reported another striking similarity. The researchers identified the step-by-step process from the sentry guarding the cell perimeter to the deployment of the defensive immune mechanisms. The details from danger signal to action were worked out in isolated cells of the mustard Arabidopsis thaliana.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/mustard-shows-backbone-its-own-defense&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:20:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3151 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Evergreen Revolution&#039; called for</title>
 <link>http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/evergreen-revolution-called</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;M.S. Swaminathan, a world-renowned agricultural scientist, outlined a plan that focuses on educating women in developing countries, getting new technology out to rural areas, and incorporating into farming practices scientific advances such as genetically engineered crops and new techniques to conserve water. &quot;If the future is to be truly sustainable, it must have all these factors: economics, equity, and employment,&quot; said Swaminathan, who addressed about 100 people who gathered March 9, 2001, in the Science Center at Harvard University. Swaminathan&#039;s lecture was sponsored by the University Committee on the Environment, the School of Public Health&#039;s Program on Water and Health, the Working Group on Environmental Justice and the Education Development Center Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/evergreen-revolution-called&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:10:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2921 at http://www.harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
